From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-21 06:23:59
From: "John Max Skaller" <skaller_at_[hidden]>
> I analysed this years ago. I wouldn't support
> the proposal in N1295 for that reason.
It's a proof of concept. It was supposed to demonstrate that an extension to
the current syntax can support partial specializations, and that the
extended syntax does not introduce additional problems that aren't already
present with the full specialization syntax.
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk