From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-30 17:52:27
on 8/30/01 3:13 AM, David Abrahams at david.abrahams_at_[hidden] wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <helmut.zeisel_at_[hidden]>
>> On Monday, I sent an updated version of operators.hpp and operators.htm
>> (based on the version in boost_1_24_0) per mail to you. Since I did not
>> receive any reaction, I assume it is lost.
> Not lost, but I'm extremely busy at the moment. What I saw looked good.
>> Now I uploaded the same version:
> That's probably best, so now others concerned (I'm thinking of Daryle and
> Aleksey) can have a look.
It looks OK. But should the prefix be "_left"? Would something like
"_reversed" be better?
Some minor points (some with locations from Helmut's HTML file):
1. In the output iterator section of the documentation, there is a ">" not
escaped to a ">" in the sample code. (Line 1190) I know it's an
leftover error, and not by Helmut.
2. Both of the new <h4> headers have closing </h3> tags instead of </h4>.
Those screw up my HTML checker, besides error . (Lines 158 and 185)
3. The table entries showing the requirements for the new "_left" templates
should use a semicolon ("T temp(u); temp -= t") between the statements
instead of a period ("T temp(u). temp -= t").
4. As David said, some of the new text needs to be clearer.
5. Will test cases be made for the new (basic) templates?
-- Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT mac DOT com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk