Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: giles.oatley_at_[hidden]
Date: 2001-08-31 06:50:51

Next message: conversy_at_[hidden]: "Re: python and abstract class with a non-default constructor"
Previous message: conversy_at_[hidden]: "python and abstract class with a non-default constructor"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] functional.hpp and mem_fun.hpp (was [Review] bind)"
Next in thread: Greg Chicares: "Re: [boost] boost and Borland C++ Builder project"
Reply: Greg Chicares: "Re: [boost] boost and Borland C++ Builder project"
Reply: AlisdairM: "RE: [boost] boost and Borland C++ Builder project"

I've developed some software in Borland C++ Builder (5) and need graph
matching facilities.
Is it going to be difficult to use Boost to link in with my project? Has
anyone
already done a similar thing - reason I ask is that I see VC++ and Borland
command line compiler mentioned a lot, but not Builder.
I'm not too good a programmer so I'd appreciate an 'honest' reply as to how
difficult it will be, so I can plan alternatives if need be.

thanks

Giles

Next message: conversy_at_[hidden]: "Re: python and abstract class with a non-default constructor"
Previous message: conversy_at_[hidden]: "python and abstract class with a non-default constructor"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] functional.hpp and mem_fun.hpp (was [Review] bind)"
Next in thread: Greg Chicares: "Re: [boost] boost and Borland C++ Builder project"
Reply: Greg Chicares: "Re: [boost] boost and Borland C++ Builder project"
Reply: AlisdairM: "RE: [boost] boost and Borland C++ Builder project"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk