From: Greg Chicares (chicares_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-09-05 16:50:26
Beman Dawes wrote:
> At 09:52 AM 9/5/2001, Philip Nash wrote:
> just a sensible
> >grouping of libraries, maybe in a hierarchical fashion ...
> One very simple way to do this, without impacting anything else, is simply
> reorganize the presentation of libraries on
> See the attached for a first cut.
> A final version would include a little table-of-contents at the beginning,
> and might also still include the purely alphabetic list in a separate
> Comments? Does this address enough of the concerns to make it worth doing?
Nice. Much easier for people who aren't already familiar
with the individual libraries. Given this, I see no need
for the flat alphabetically-sorted list.
The heading "Beta Libraries" begs the question "should I
rely on these or not?" A sentence or two right after the
header could clarify exactly what "beta" means here. I'd
try drafting something, but I'm not sure what it means.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk