From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (alexy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-09-06 10:50:06
Beman Dawes wrote:
> See the attached for a first cut.
It looks good, and it's certainly an improvement over the plain alphabetic
list (which still can be useful too). One thing that concerns me, though, is
classification such libraries as 'tuple', 'function', 'functional' and
'compose' into "Helpers" as opposite to "General use" category. For example,
to me 'any' library doesn't seem to be in any way more "general purpose"
than 'boost::function' or 'tuple', and I would prefer to see all of those in
the same category.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk