From: Thomas Matelich (toms-mailing-lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-09-19 12:33:12
Jeremy Siek wrote:
> toms-m> expensive for a low to medium budget operation, however if
> toms-m> you look at the compiler status on Linux, it does very
> toms-m> well.
> The linux version of KAI is not that expensive...
The Linux personal use is out of my personal price range. I think KAI on HP-UX is
actually cheaper that aCC though.
Too bad the commercial licenses would be hard to get past my stingy management,
especially since I develop on both Linux and HP. Funny how expensive debug/workaround
time doesn't compare against expenditures. Then again, we would need like 10-15 seats
-- Thomas O Matelich Senior Software Designer Zetec, Inc. matelich_at_[hidden] tmatelich_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk