Boost logo

Boost :

From: Jeremy Siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-09-19 18:52:23

On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Eric Ford wrote:
eford> Of course, this introduces additional function_requires<>() which I
eford> don't want to do for the performance hit mentioned previously. I
eford> tried adding inline as well as -finline-functions with no luck. I
eford> think I'll just create a few macros so it can be selectively compiled
eford> in. That's a little obnoxious for concepts that take two template
eford> parameters on account of the ",".

One of the other grad students here at IU (Jeremiah Willcock) just tried
adding "inline" (both to function_requires and
ignore_unused_variable_warnings) and that seemed to do the trick. Did you
add "inline" to ignore_unused_variable_warnings?


 Jeremy Siek
 Ph.D. Student, Indiana Univ. B'ton email: jsiek_at_[hidden]
 C++ Booster ( office phone: (812) 855-9761

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at