Re: [boost] Re: concept checking for templatize member function?

From: Jeremy Siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-09-19 18:52:23

On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Eric Ford wrote:
eford> Of course, this introduces additional function_requires<>() which I
eford> don't want to do for the performance hit mentioned previously.  I
eford> tried adding inline as well as -finline-functions with no luck.  I
eford> think I'll just create a few macros so it can be selectively compiled
eford> in.  That's a little obnoxious for concepts that take two template
eford> parameters on account of the ",".

One of the other grad students here at IU (Jeremiah Willcock) just tried
adding "inline" (both to function_requires and
ignore_unused_variable_warnings) and that seemed to do the trick. Did you
add "inline" to ignore_unused_variable_warnings?

Cheers,
Jeremy

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jeremy Siek                          http://php.indiana.edu/~jsiek/
 Ph.D. Student, Indiana Univ. B'ton   email: jsiek_at_[hidden]
 C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org)   office phone: [phone]
----------------------------------------------------------------------