Re: [boost] BOOST_NO_CTYPE_FUNCTIONS?

From: Darin Adler (darin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-09-23 11:01:53

on 9/23/01 3:55 AM, John Maddock at John_Maddock_at_[hidden] wrote:

> OK, but it will involve major surgery - all those std:: prefixes to isXXX
> will have to change, so will the section in boost/regex/config.hpp that
> undef's the macros to get at the C API's.

My workaround is to declare inline functions before the undefs. It turns out
to be less than major surgery.

> Are you completely sure that there are no real declarations?

Yes, I'm sure. I've run into this problem before. There are many Unix
systems that have these non-compliant <ctype.h> files that lack the
functions.

> I'm going to busy for a bit, so go ahead and make the changes if you want -
> Oh and don't forget the config test program :-)

OK. I'll work on it.

    -- Darin