Re: [boost] BOOST_NO_CTYPE_FUNCTIONS?

From: Howard Hinnant (hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-09-23 11:19:51

On Sunday, September 23, 2001, at 12:04  PM, Darin Adler wrote:

> I used an even simpler workaround:
>
>     inline int (isspace)(int x) {return isspace(x);}
>     #undef isspace
>
> The parentheses around the name of the function are legal, and they 
> prevent
> the isspace() macro from expanding. I do put this in the std namespace.

Yup, I like that even better! :-)

-Howard