From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-09-25 07:59:22
One way we sometimes handle things like this is that the dependencies go
into the detail namespace of your library, and then get moved to the
appropriate place upon acceptance as libraries in their own right. We have
also used the boost-root/boost/pending directory to store libraries whose
status is "pending approval", but IIRC we've been trying to phase that part
of the directory tree out.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:09 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] Re: Regression results as XML?
> From: "Daryle Walker" <darylew_at_[hidden]>
> > on 9/24/01 7:29 PM, Jens Maurer at Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden] wrote:
> > > Damien Fisher wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Well...why isn't there an XML parser in boost?
> > >
> > > Because nobody has written one and offered it for inclusion
> > > into boost. Feel free to do so.
> > I was just thinking about this right before reading this message. I
> > that XML was supposed to be designed so a CS student could write a
> > within a week. (I guess this means just enough to check for well-formed
> > files, and not validation nor all the whiz-bang stuff like XSL, XPath,
> > Schema, XQuery, etc.)
> I feel obliged to say that I have a non-validating, extremely simple,
> XML/HTML parser (that handles reasonably ill-formed XML because it's
> intended to be used in the real HTML world.)
> The reason that I haven't submitted it yet is that it depends on my
> variant<> class. My variant<> class, in turn, depends on my impl_ptr<>
> class. So the XML parser is three submissions away. ;-)
> I can try to shuffle my priorities a bit if having a boost XML parser is
> critical. ;-)
> Peter Dimov
> Multi Media Ltd.
> Info: http://www.boost.org Unsubscribe:
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk