From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-09-26 18:57:50
----- Original Message -----
> Neither "iteratible" nor "iteratable" are words. Webster's Revised
> Unabridged Dictionary says the correct word is "iterable".
I think the problem with "iterable" is that it means something different
from what we mean to denote. It would be better to choose a "word" that has
come into common usage and means what we intend, than to choose one that's
officially sanctioned by Webster's but means something else.
David Abrahams, C++ library designer
C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk