From: Fernando Cacciola (fcacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-02 16:23:29
----- Original Message -----
From: Thomas Lien <tgunlien_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:50 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: Grid Response from helmut
> > What is the difference between your grid and a
> > matrix?
> I chose the name grid because in my mind, Matrix
> implies a NUMERICAL grid, which my current
> implementation would not have to be restricted to.
Perhaps you can use the term "Lattice".
A Lattice is a "uniform arrangement of equally spaced elements"
The term is used, for instance, in Computer Graphics to refer to the data
structure used to store digital images.
AFAICT, a matrix can be seen as a lattice of numbers.
> > Why do you fix the dimensions ROW/COL at compile
> > time?
> This decision was made to prevent improper operations
> at compile time such assignment of a grid with
> different dimensions to another (clearly a bad thing).
I'm not sure what do you mean with: "improper operations at compile time
such as assignment"
Assignment is not a compile-time operation.
Do you mean to detect at compile time that your are mixing grids of
If that's the case, are you sure that you want to have a complete class just
in order to detect slicing, given that any ordinary fixed-but-runtime sized
array class (such as a matrix class) can detect that at runtime?
Are there any other advantages on fixing the size at compile time?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk