From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-08 19:16:45
on 10/4/01 4:28 PM, David Abrahams at david.abrahams_at_[hidden] wrote:
> It is traditional to respond directly to the review summary
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/message/18007, so that reviewers know
> that all concerns have at least been examined. Would you mind doing that?
> Also, although the future of these libraries is now partly in your hands, it
> would be best to minimize large changes between the review and the time that
> the code is first integrated into boost's CVS tree. Large enhancements
> (overflow checking is an example) ought to appear in a second revision, just
> to preserve revision history.
So now what?
-- Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT mac DOT com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk