Boost logo

Boost :

From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-08 19:16:45

on 10/4/01 4:28 PM, David Abrahams at david.abrahams_at_[hidden] wrote:

> It is traditional to respond directly to the review summary
>, so that reviewers know
> that all concerns have at least been examined. Would you mind doing that?


> Also, although the future of these libraries is now partly in your hands, it
> would be best to minimize large changes between the review and the time that
> the code is first integrated into boost's CVS tree. Large enhancements
> (overflow checking is an example) ought to appear in a second revision, just
> to preserve revision history.

So now what?

Daryle Walker
Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie
darylew AT mac DOT com

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at