Re: Reaction to dlw_int.zip review

From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-08 19:16:45

on 10/4/01 4:28 PM, David Abrahams at david.abrahams_at_[hidden] wrote:

> It is traditional to respond directly to the review summary
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/message/18007, so that reviewers know
> that all concerns have at least been examined. Would you mind doing that?

Done.

> Also, although the future of these libraries is now partly in your hands, it
> would be best to minimize large changes between the review and the time that
> the code is first integrated into boost's CVS tree. Large enhancements
> (overflow checking is an example) ought to appear in a second revision, just
> to preserve revision history.

So now what?

-- 
Daryle Walker
Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie
darylew AT mac DOT com