From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-09 09:24:58
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daryle Walker" <darylew_at_[hidden]>
> > Also, although the future of these libraries is now partly in your
> > would be best to minimize large changes between the review and the time
> > the code is first integrated into boost's CVS tree. Large enhancements
> > (overflow checking is an example) ought to appear in a second revision,
> > to preserve revision history.
> So now what?
Maybe something, maybe nothing. Use your best judgement. If it's practical,
you could request that the revision which was accepted be checked in,
followed by your latest version. Try to package things so that the effort of
integrating your changes is not too great.
David Abrahams, C++ library designer for hire
C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk