From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-13 07:24:02
Would it be a good idea to add direct member function support to
boost::function? The semantics would be 'as if' the user had wrapped the
member function in boost::mem_fn.
It's an obvious 'chrome' feature - i.e. convenience/polish only, no extra
functionality - but it's quite useful at times, especially when you're
initializing an array of boost::functions.
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk