Boost logo

Boost :

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-13 07:24:02

Would it be a good idea to add direct member function support to
boost::function? The semantics would be 'as if' the user had wrapped the
member function in boost::mem_fn.

It's an obvious 'chrome' feature - i.e. convenience/polish only, no extra
functionality - but it's quite useful at times, especially when you're
initializing an array of boost::functions.

Peter Dimov
Multi Media Ltd.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at