Boost logo

Boost :

From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-16 09:07:19

On Saturday 13 October 2001 08:24, you wrote:
> Would it be a good idea to add direct member function support to
> boost::function? The semantics would be 'as if' the user had wrapped the
> member function in boost::mem_fn.

I was against this because normalizing member function support is orthogonal
to call functions; however, I'm starting to change my mind on this because
usability really is more important here, and boost::mem_fn exists now. I'm
still against taking the next step to allow any binding to occur in function.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at