From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-15 20:57:20
Just so everyone knows, the original post below was caught by the new
first-message moderation procedure, but an administrative SNAFU let it
through later, but I'm sure we'll work out the kinks soon enough. The OP has
already posted a more moderate question on the topic.
Thanks go to Bill for trying to keep the level of the discussion to our
usual high standards.
Regards to all from OOPSLA,
David Abrahams, C++ library designer for hire
C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 1:46 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: boost:threads build...
> --- In boost_at_y..., Karl Pitrich <pit_at_r...> wrote:
> > hi.
> > as it seems impossible after messing around for some hours
> > with this fu^H^H worse excuse for automake/autoconf named jam,
> > to build the threads library with it,
> > has anyone a Makefile to build the threads library standalone?
> Careful with your wording here. One can understand your frustration,
> but you're likely to offend the people who can help you if you aren't
> careful with your wording.
> The Boost.Threads library was built using Jam from the very
> beginning. I build the Boost.Threads library with MSVC++ using the
> Jam stuff in Boost.Build on a near daily basis. I've even been
> building using gcc as of late. I know others have built it with
> other compilers and even on other platforms as well. Sooo...
> What platform/compiler are you using? What, precisely, is not
> working for you? What error messages are you getting? Maybe we can
> help you to get things working with Jam, which is going to be better
> for you in the long run since that's the direction that all of Boost
> will be taking in the future.
> Bill Kempf
> Info: http://www.boost.org Unsubscribe:
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk