Re: [boost] Functions with fewer parameters and Boost.Function

From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-16 21:15:26

On Tuesday 16 October 2001 07:30, you wrote:
> Is there a nice way of fitting this into Boost.Function, or is it maybe in
> there already? Maybe Boost.Bind offers a way to do this? Or maybe this is
> impossible to implement?

Neither Function nor Bind allow this, but the Lambda library might. It 
wouldn't fit well in Function, but it could be added to Bind - at the cost of 
a lot more "bind" overloads.

        Doug