Re: Functions with fewer parameters and Boost.Function

From: helmut.zeisel_at_[hidden]
Date: 2001-10-17 01:44:34

--- In boost_at_y..., Douglas Gregor <gregod_at_c...> wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 October 2001 07:30, you wrote:
> > Is there a nice way of fitting this into Boost.Function, or is it 
maybe in
> > there already? Maybe Boost.Bind offers a way to do this? Or maybe 
this is
> > impossible to implement?
> 
> Neither Function nor Bind allow this, but the Lambda library might. 

Which Lambda library?
Is there a Lambda calculus library in boost?

Helmut