Re: [boost] shared_ptr bug?

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-18 11:05:46

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>

> I agree that the implementation is more complicated than necessary, but I
> don't think that this is caused by the separate count design.

I am prepared to accept that; I cited the design as a possible cause without
any real evidence. I think your swap() solution does much to simplify
things. What else needs to be done? Anything?

===================================================
  David Abrahams, C++ library designer for hire
 resume: http://users.rcn.com/abrahams/resume.html

        C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org)
          email: david.abrahams_at_[hidden]
===================================================