From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-18 11:05:46
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
> I agree that the implementation is more complicated than necessary, but I
> don't think that this is caused by the separate count design.
I am prepared to accept that; I cited the design as a possible cause without
any real evidence. I think your swap() solution does much to simplify
things. What else needs to be done? Anything?
David Abrahams, C++ library designer for hire
C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk