From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-18 10:51:38
From: "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
> > I agree that the implementation is more complicated than necessary, but
> > don't think that this is caused by the separate count design.
> I am prepared to accept that; I cited the design as a possible cause
> any real evidence. I think your swap() solution does much to simplify
> things. What else needs to be done? Anything?
Well I've done my part:
It didn't go anywhere.
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk