Re: thread lib: solaris problems.

From: williamkempf_at_[hidden]
Date: 2001-10-30 16:45:04

--- In boost_at_y..., "Gennadiy E. Rozental" <rogeeff_at_m...> wrote:
> EINVAL
> 
> > It would help if someone can determine precisely what error is 
> being 
> > returned here (in the name format instead of the integer 
> equivalent).
> > 
> > Bill Kempf

OK, that's a starting point.  Unfortunately, I don't see how any of 
the parameters can be considered invalid.  Especially since this same 
code works on other POSIX/pthread platforms.

Let's try and assume that the guess about the implementation figuring 
out there are no other running threads to signal the condition is the 
culprit.  Can someone on Solaris modify the code such that a dummy 
thread is created that simply sleeps for twice as long as we 
timeout?  This should help to eliminate this guess as the culprit.

Bill Kempf