Re: [boost] Deriving the type of a value in a class template

From: Sean Parent (sparent_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-05 14:41:04

Perhaps I'm wrong - but my read of shared_ptr leads me to believe that if I
have a special function to delete my pointer then I need to either
specialize shared_deleter<> or, I suppose, overload checked_delete<>().

Further - if I have an allocator that requires instance data I have no way
to provide that to shared_ptr.

Sean

on 11/3/01 4:23 AM, Peter Dimov at pdimov_at_[hidden] wrote:

> From: "Sean Parent" <sparent_at_[hidden]>
>> Using a trait template (Peter's approach) functions fine - But I'm trying
> to
>> get rid of the need to write a template specialization or special class to
>> use a template (not just with auto_ptr but everywhere in the STL). The
>> ultimate goal is to make the template library easier to use and eliminate
> as
>> much "boiler plate" declarations and code as possible.
> 
> Sorry, I don't understand. There is no need to write a template
> specialization.
> 
> --
> Peter Dimov
> Multi Media Ltd.
> 
> 
> Info: http://www.boost.org  Unsubscribe:
> <mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
> 

-- 
Sean Parent
Sr. Computer Scientist II
Advanced Technology Group
Adobe Systems Incorporated
sparent_at_[hidden]