Re: [boost] 1.25.1 preliminary Win32 regression

From: Darin Adler (darin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-05 21:55:33

on 11/5/01 4:57 PM, Beman Dawes at bdawes_at_[hidden] wrote:

> Hum... That didn't fix it.  Note I'm still running 6.1.  7.0 is sitting
> here, but I haven't installed it for lack of disk space.

Darn. Well, I am assuming the problem is the error with the enum constant
being out of range that I saw on Macintosh. But I now realize that I assumed
that "-enums min" would fix this, but haven't had a chance to re-run the
Macintosh regression since I made that change. So it's possible that this
enum problem doesn't have a simple fix.

In any case, it's a minor issue since it affects the test but not the thing
being tested. There's nothing in the rest of Boost that relies on having
long longs as values in enumerations.

    -- Darin