From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-06 00:15:21
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremy Siek" <jsiek_at_[hidden]>
> ct_if.hpp isn't new. It's been there since the birth of the BGL. But I've
> had problems with it before with Borland. Also there's a bunch of problems
> due to is_convertible.
Sorry, I just meant that it's new to iterator_adaptors, or at least fewer of
the tests depended on it. The problems I saw with ct_if were obviously just
the first layer of the onion.
David Abrahams, C++ library designer for hire
C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk