From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-07 21:15:52
At 01:58 AM 11/7/2001, Daryle Walker wrote:
>1. Since the "tie"-ing code has moved from the utility library, the
>declaration of the "boost::tied" class template should be removed from
Shouldn't we leave it in for awhile? Doesn't existing code likely depend
>2. The HTML file that lists all the libraries needs some edits.
>A. Under the "miscellaneous" section, the listing of the utility library
>should only mention "noncopyable," since the other items in that library
>already given in the other listings that library gets in other sections.
>B. The base-from-member idiom library needs to be listed.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk