From: Darin Adler (darin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-12 18:44:38
on 11/12/01 12:08 PM, Thomas Matelich at toms-mailing-lists_at_[hidden] wrote:
> [plea to keep libraries from becoming too interdependent]
Are you making a specific proposal?
I see these options:
1) don't do any asserts in Boost code
2) do <assert.h> asserts in Boost code
3) make a separate configurable assert system for use in each Boost
4) create something like Boost.Assert
Do you have an alternative other than these 4?
I know that Peter is also determined to keep the libraries as independent as
possible because of our recent smart_ptr discussions.
One nice thing is that the proposed Boost.Assert doesn't depend on any other
Boost library (for example, Boost.Config).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk