Re: [boost] bind, void returns, msvc, MWERKS

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-14 10:05:12

Another thing occurred to me:
We should probably add a test which will check the void return
functionality. ;-)

-Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]>
To: "boost" <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:40 AM
Subject: [boost] bind, void returns, msvc, MWERKS

> I just checked in some more changes on the void_returns branch to bind.hpp
> and mem_fn.hpp. To actually get things working required many more changes
> than I'd thought. I also had to make some changes for CodeWarrior
> compatibility, basically turning on BOOST_MEM_FN_ENABLE_STDCALL
> unconditionally under Win32. I don't really understand what that means,
but
> the compiler choked on the alternate section of code.
>
> I've tested the code with gcc 3.0.2 (cygwin), Metrowerks CodeWarrior 7
(7.1
> beta or something in fact), Borland 5.5.1, Intel C++ (Version 6.0 Beta
> Build 011005Z).
>
> Peter, I'd appreciate it if you'd have another look at what I did before I
> integrate.
>
> ===================================================
>   David Abrahams, C++ library designer for hire
>  resume: http://users.rcn.com/abrahams/resume.html
>
>         C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org)
>           email: david.abrahams_at_[hidden]
> ===================================================
>
>
>
> Info: http://www.boost.org  Unsubscribe:
<mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>