Boost logo

Boost :

From: scleary_at_[hidden]
Date: 2001-11-16 10:15:02

> From: David Abrahams [mailto:david.abrahams_at_[hidden]]
> Right. My point is that there are any number of "non-standard conforming
> behaviors" that you get anyway in a multithreaded system. For example:
> int x = 1;
> bool success = start_some_threads();
> int y = x;

Hmmm... Yes, I see your point. Though by making 'x' volatile, this could be
conforming -- with my problem, there's nothing you can do to make it


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at