Boost logo

Boost :

From: scleary_at_[hidden]
Date: 2001-11-16 10:15:02


> From: David Abrahams [mailto:david.abrahams_at_[hidden]]
>
> Right. My point is that there are any number of "non-standard conforming
> behaviors" that you get anyway in a multithreaded system. For example:
>
> int x = 1;
> bool success = start_some_threads();
> int y = x;
>

Hmmm... Yes, I see your point. Though by making 'x' volatile, this could be
conforming -- with my problem, there's nothing you can do to make it
conforming.

        -Steve


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk