From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-22 07:18:08
I have uploaded a second draft at
Any further comments, or implementations for other platforms, are welcome.
A meta-question raised by atomic_count is:
How do we proceed about this kind of submission? Do we put it through a
full-blown formal review, with all its 'formalities'? Or would an 'informal'
review be acceptable? (This applies to assert.hpp as well.)
Another interesting question is where should atomic_count.hpp go, in boost/,
in boost/detail, or in boost/thread, perhaps. Being in detail/ has the
advantage(?) of not needing documentation. ;-)
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk