Boost logo

Boost :

From: Andrei Alexandrescu (andrewalex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-26 00:55:11

> One consideration, which seemed important at the time, was that bitset
> be stack-based for efficiency. It seems difficult to do that for a
> one-size-fits-all class like you're suggesting (although I'm sure there's
> Alexandrescu-like approach to solve the problem.)

Thanks but you're giving me way too much credit. I think it's a straight
policy passed as a template argument. Then the policy has two
implementations: one that uses straight allocation and one that uses dynamic
allocation. The functions for dynamic growth will return errors or will not
compile at all (if called) for the non-dynamic implementation. It's that


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at