From: Andrei Alexandrescu (andrewalex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-26 11:53:15
From: "Jeremy Siek" <jsiek_at_[hidden]>
> On 11/26/01 12:27 AM, "Matt Austern" <austern_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Seems to me that we should really be looking at extending vector<bool>,
> > not extending bitset. A few trivial addons to vector<bool>, and we've
> > got a class that does everything bitset does and more. (Yeah, I know:
> > vector<bool> shouldn't be spelled vector<bool>, it should be spelled
> > bit_vector. Details.)
> I would argue against this.
By the way, isn't word airing that std::vector<bool> in its current form is
likely to be repudiated?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk