From: Andrei Alexandrescu (andrewalex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-26 15:28:05
From: "Hamish Mackenzie" <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Sorry I was not aware of type2type and made up the name static_arg as I
> was writing the response to Geurt's emial. FWIW I think static_arg is
> more descriptive in this case. Perhaps there is a place for both?
Quite frankly static_arg sounds terrible to me :o).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk