From: Andrei Alexandrescu (andrewalex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-29 16:38:00
From: "Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]>
> > 2. How would boost users have benefitted from our hosting of that code?
> Singleton, Multimethods, Vistor, and Factories. Real tools for building
> that Boost doesn't have now. The benefits are going to be less where
> already has solutions: smart pointers, small object allocations, and
This brings up a delicate point. It is actually exactly where I thought
there's going to be much discussion; now, in light of the discussion that
already took place, it seems like that is going to be a _very_ long debate
(if I don't give up on it from the start).
The delicate point is that I plan on submitting things from Loki that
overlap with stuff that already is approved and used in boost. Take for
example functors - I am going to basically propose a total replacement of
boost's functors with an improved version of Loki's Functor (that I'm
working on), and I will bring arguments on why I think Loki's version is
superior. This is likely to annoy pretty much everybody: (1) the users of
the current boost functors; (2) the creators of the boost functors, who
obviously spent a great deal of time working on them; (3) the whole boost
community, who spent time on reviewing and improving the functors. So I have
no idea on how that is going to go.
Now that you brought smart pointers - my (and some boosters') belief is
that, on the contrary, Loki's smart pointers are perhaps the most
interesting addition to boost.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk