From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-29 19:39:14
At 05:40 PM 11/29/2001, Jeff Garland wrote:
>> Now that you brought smart pointers - my (and some boosters') belief is
>> that, on the contrary, Loki's smart pointers are perhaps the most
>> interesting addition to boost.
>Sure, however, perhaps foolishly, I think that there is less issue
>The Loki smart pointer is a super-set of the boost smart_ptr and should
>be able to basically replace or augment the current implementation.
Yes. Also note that those involved in the Boost smart pointers have never
viewed them as the final word on smart pointers. We've been actively
looking for user friendly ways to provide a wider feature set for a long
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk