|
Boost : |
From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-29 19:51:13
> Yes. Also note that those involved in the Boost smart pointers have never
> viewed them as the final word on smart pointers. We've been actively
> looking for user friendly ways to provide a wider feature set for a long
> time.
Exactly. In fact, smart_ptr might be a better starting point b/c it is
independent of apparently controversial technologies. Not to mention that it is
necessary component #1 on every C++ project under the Sun.
Jeff
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk