RE: [boost] Re: boost support for date/time handling?

From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-17 08:37:52

> I've been using a set of classes for years that is accurate to the precision
> of your double, which means it is exact from the Gregorian cutoff of October
> 15, 1582 until February 11, 1,464,999. It has a little error for dates
> before the 1582 cutoff. It also does business day calculations and every
> other date computation I've ever heard of. Maybe we should compare notes?

Absolutely we should compare notes -- date and time are very deep topics...

Jeff