|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-17 16:48:40
Vesa,
This is totally cool. However, I have a philosophical problem with the
preprocessor library (maybe philosophical is the wrong word): If I have to
debug code generated by the preprocessor library, or even understand the
source, I'm going to have a hard time. So far, I've been using some Python
scripts to generate readable, debuggable C++ when neccessary. I also have
had some practical problems using PREPROCESSOR with Metrowerk's broken
preprocessor. So, I guess I'm trying to figure out when/where I'd want to
use Boost.PREPROCESSOR instead of my Python scripts.
Looking for insight,
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vesa Karvonen" <vesa.karvonen_at_[hidden]>
>
> /*
> The question is: Should this functionality be added to
> the preprocessor library?
>
> Personally, I have no idea of how useful this stuff would be.
> I'd like to know if anyone has ideas on how to use the
> functionality or is otherwise interested.
> */
>
>
>
> Info: http://www.boost.org Send unsubscribe requests to:
<mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk