Boost logo

Boost :

From: mfdylan (dylan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-19 18:45:45


--- In boost_at_y..., "Andrei Alexandrescu" <andrewalex_at_h...> wrote:
> From: "Ross Smith" <r-smith_at_i...>
> > I submit that a tight coupling between sockets and iostreams --
by which
> > I mean a socket library designed on the assumption that iostreams
will
> > be the principal socket I/O mechanism -- would be a very bad
idea. I'll
> > try to explain why.
>
> Besides, many people have never been very fond of iostreams'
design...
>
From what perspective? Certainly I've found that deriving a
streambuf class is unnecessarily messy. But in general it works
better than I/O in most other languages.

Dylan


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk