Attachment problem (was: Re: compile-time partial port of bind)

From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-19 19:21:10

on 12/15/01 9:23 PM, Peter Dimov at pdimov_at_[hidden] wrote:

> The case of the disappearing body isn't limited to text attachments, as it
> seems.

Do you get the individual Boost messages?  I got the previous version of
your message just fine.  These messages are in daily digest 1062, with the
message I'm responding to as #15 and the original version as #14.  Of
course, Yahoo never includes attachments in the daily digests.  (Actually,
it is stupid enough to include text attachments, then post a notice that the
attachment was skipped.)

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
> To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 21:21
> Subject: Re: [boost] compile-time partial port of bind
> 
> 
>> From: "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]>
>>> Interesting that even with msvc workarounds I expect the full implementation
>>> would be smaller than the runtime version!
>> 
>> Indeed. See the atached file. The main reason for the simplicity of the
>> compile-time variant is the pure functionality; the other simplification
>> comes from the fact that it's easy to make a 'variadic' compile-time
>> function without overloads.

-- 
Daryle Walker
Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie
darylew AT mac DOT com