From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-03 10:08:04
The problem is that we have not yet got around to integrating the regression
testing table generation with Boost.Build. Instead, the regression tests are
run by a separate program written by Jens Maurer:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve M. Robbins" <steven.robbins_at_[hidden]>
> I am working with the 1.26.0 release.
> I had a look at the test results for linux
> (http://www.boost.org/status/cs-linux.html) but did not see my
> compiler (GCC 2.95.4 without stlport) listed.
> I would like to generate the table for my compiler. I thought it
> could be done using something simple like "jam test". I have done
> the following
> make -C tools/build/jam_src
> tools/build/jam_src/bin.linuxx86/jam -sBOOST_ROOT=. -sTOOLS="gcc"
> tools/build/jam_src/bin.linuxx86/jam -sBOOST_ROOT=. -sTOOLS="gcc" test
> A whole lot of files were generated in status/bin, but the "cs-linux.html"
> file was not changed. Am I barking up the wrong tree?
> Or could the problem be caused simply by targets that failed to build?
> At the end of the "jam ... test" output, I see
> ...failed updating 8 targets...
> ...skipped 28 targets...
> ...updated 668 targets...
> Any help is appreciated. Basically, I noticed that GCC 2.95.3
> failed several tests, while GCC 2.95.3 + stlport and GCC 3.0.1
> both passed all tests. So I am wondering whether or not GCC 2.95.4
> needs stlport.
> by Rocket to the Moon,
> by Airplane to the Rocket,
> by Taxi to the Airport,
> by Frontdoor to the Taxi,
> by throwing back the blanket and laying down the legs ...
> - They Might Be Giants
> Info: http://www.boost.org Send unsubscribe requests to:
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk