Date: 2002-01-04 06:13:20
4 Jan 2002 13:01:57 +0300 Ken Hagan wrote:
>parameters, then we might reason that when "long long" is added to C++ it
I personally would like to see int_t<64> to be added into standard C++
rather than "long long", "long long long" etc. Why not to implement
int_t<64> via "long long" when host compiler allows it, and leave it
unimplemented, or implement it via software emulation, when not?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk