Re: [boost] Re: some comments on integer library additions

From: jk_at_[hidden]
Date: 2002-01-04 06:13:20

4 Jan 2002 13:01:57 +0300 Ken Hagan wrote:
>parameters, then we might reason that when "long long" is added to C++ it

I personally would like to see int_t<64> to be added into standard C++
rather than "long long", "long long long" etc. Why not to implement
int_t<64> via "long long" when host compiler allows it, and leave it
unimplemented, or implement it via software emulation, when not?

-- 
jk