From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-11 11:46:22
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrei Alexandrescu" <andrewalex_at_[hidden]>
> But this operation is nonsensical in most, if not all, cases. Why would
> someone need to alter a shared_array? It doesn't make sense; it means that
> either before, or after the operation, the pointee array will be wrong.
I don't understand what you're saying. This sounds like an argument for
functional programming in general (all data is const) ???
Doesn't the shared_array as owning iterator make sense to you?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk