From: Andrei Alexandrescu (andrewalex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-11 11:52:10
> I don't understand what you're saying. This sounds like an argument for
> functional programming in general (all data is const) ???
> Doesn't the shared_array as owning iterator make sense to you?
The idea is that shared_array points to the beginning of an array allocated
with new. Then, you don't want to alter it because the restructor will call
delete on the pointee object, which must be there.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk