From: bill_kempf (williamkempf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-16 16:04:48
--- In boost_at_y..., Bill Seymour <bill-at-the-office_at_p...> wrote:
> Chico: Hey, Doc; it hurts when I go like this.
> Groucho: Don't go like that.
> I wouldn't want to see Boost impose a fix on the user.
> The best choice is for the MSVC user to not write code
> that depends on MSVC's quirks (or absence of quirks).
> (We're talking about Boost users here. They are
> probably not among those MSVC users who write BOOL
> instead of bool, or CString instead of string.)
The problem is that non-MSVC users can write code that won't compile
for (int i=0; i < 10; ++i)
for (int i=0; i < 20; ++i)
However, I don't like the fix and would hate to see it forced on me
by Boost. I think it's better to just avoid this, and fix any bugs
when they are discovered.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk