From: David A. Greene (greened_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-17 12:35:53
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> I think we better stop this discussion, as it brings us nowhere. I can use
> YACC, or ANTRL or Spirit or whatever. I won't use Spirit unless I'm shown
> that Spirit is appropriate for the task. So far, no concrete examples were
I have given my example. I've decided from several years of
experience that a parser generator tool should have been used
to implement it.
If a C++ CLA library uses a parser generator it should use
Spirit because Spirit provides a native, embedded domain-specific
language for specifying grammars. I don't know of any other
C++ parser generators that do this.
-- "Some little people have music in them, but Fats, he was all music, and you know how big he was." -- James P. Johnson
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk