From: Tom Becker (voidampersand_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-20 16:52:00
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 10:46:06 +0100, Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>I've only seen one review comment on Samuel's printf-like
>formatting library for iostreams so far (thanks, Ed).
>Since the review period ends on Tuesday, I'd like to see
>a few more comments. Even if you do an in-depth review, then
>please give at least an accept/don't vote.
I'd much rather that the printf-like formatting use actual
printf-like syntax. Here's a post with an approach for generating the
requisite glue. It has minimal overhead and I think it would be
perfectly reasonable to use in real-world applications.
I've been waiting to see what the response is before voting.
-- Tom Becker "Within C++, there is a much smaller and <voidampersand_at_[hidden]> cleaner language struggling to get out." -- Bjarne Stroustrup
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk