From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-20 17:13:56
At 07:49 AM 1/20/2002, Samuel Krempp wrote:
>Now that I think there is a better candidate than '%', I'll add some
>arguments for 'operator' in the doc. but it's rather a matter of
>taste, so I'm not sure I will be able to convince people with only a few
I'm sorry. I just find:
cout << format("writing %3, x=%1 : %2-th try") % 40.23 % 50 % "toto";
to be a lot easier to write and read than:
cout << format("writing %3, x=%1 : %2-th try") [40.23]  ["toto"];
I have the sense that Ed's operator suggestion would solve some technical
problems, but it just plain looks too ugly to me.
What do others think?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk