From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-24 18:05:57
At 02:01 PM 1/24/2002, bill_kempf wrote:
>> but what about, for example,
>> programmers working in an embedded environment in which there is no
>> concept of threads/processes?
>There will be no requirement for them to support threads. This is
>obviously true in Boost.Threads, and my understanding is that this is
>the thinking of the Committee members as well.
Yes. The committee is working on a type 2 Technical Report. Such TR's are
non-normative. That means a conforming implementation will not be required
to provide anything in the TR.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk