Re: [boost] mem_var_* (like mem_fun_*)

From: Darin Adler (darin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-28 12:35:50

On 1/28/02 9:30 AM, "Hamish Mackenzie" <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 15:13, Hamish Mackenzie wrote:
>> I am writing some code that uses a C based API (Microsoft's MAPI) and it
>> would be handy to have mem_var_* classes to access members of structures
>> without having to write helper functions.  Do these exist already?

Something like this sounds like a good idea for classes with public data
members. I would call it mem_data_*, though, because the standard
terminology is "function members" and "data members". No use of the word
"variable".

    -- Darin